Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to atmosphere | Shell

A senior security guide has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change dangers” and urged others within the oil and fuel business to “stroll away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The manager, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had quit because of Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not placing environmental safety earlier than manufacturing”.

She said: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to our environment and to folks. And whatever they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to deal with the implications.”

Shell was a “main shopper” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline manufacturing. She began working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “Because, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around internet zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gas, however planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a prison justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and gas employees to stroll away from the trade.

The guide, who runs inner security surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil fuel companies simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually imagine their vision for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid experiences they had been pissed off on the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions will likely be discussed at the assembly where the Dutch activist group Follow It will push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be more in step with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has informed buyers to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might expertise an investor revolt in opposition to his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Signal as much as the each day Business In the present day e-mail or observe Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson mentioned: “Be in little question, we are determined to deliver on our international strategy to be a web zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our people are working exhausting to attain this. We've set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, although the world will still want oil and fuel for decades to come back in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the vitality trade reported bumper income fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition events to name on the federal government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and gas producer in the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it would lead to the industry approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief executive, Linda Cook, advised the Financial Instances: “A better tax burden will make it tougher for brand new oil and fuel projects to fulfill investment hurdle rates, which means fewer projects might be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being inspired to extend domestic UK oil and gasoline manufacturing and help an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has instructed the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had acquired a £4.6m “golden hello” from the firm.