What’s in Kazakhstan’s Constitutional Referendum? – The Diplomat

On June 5, Kazakhs will vote on a package deal of reforms intended to rework the nation from a super-presidential system to a “presidential system with a strong parliament.”

Six months after Kazakhstan’s President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev referred to as protesters terrorists and requested help from the Russian-backed Collective Safety Treaty Organization to quell mass unrest, citizens will take part in a referendum on constitutional reforms. 

The vote will happen on June 5, just one month after the proposed reforms have been launched. The reform package deal addresses 33 separate articles – about one third of the full constitutional articles – and was developed by a working group that Tokayev established in March. The reforms are mentioned to transform Kazakhstan from a super-presidential system to a “presidential system with a strong parliament,” per Tokayev’s state of the union tackle on March 16.

A brilliant-presidential system is one where parliaments and courts are only nominally unbiased, and the president and their administration have almost unlimited management over political decision-making. Kazakhstan’s first step to a super-presidential system was the adoption of a brand new constitution in 1995 that was pushed by Nursultan Nazarbayev after dissolving an uncooperative parliament. Nazarbayev further consolidated his personal powers with constitutional amendments in 1998, 2007, and 2011.

Nazarbayev started to loosen the president’s management with constitutional amendments in 2017 that barely redistributed presidential powers to different branches of presidency and opened the trail for the election of native representatives, not less than on the village degree. Nevertheless, Nazarbayev slyly maintained his private control over Kazakhstan’s politics by including provisions that protected him as “elbasy,” or chief of the nation.

Get briefed on the story of the week, and growing stories to observe throughout the Asia-Pacific.

The proposed constitutional reforms strip the structure of mentions of elbasy and the First President of the Republic, which some see as a continued signal of the Nazarbayev family’s fall from grace. 

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Simply $5 a month.

In addition to sidelining Nazarbayev, several proposed provisions would barely limit the power of the president. The president should not be a member of a political social gathering, which member of the working group Sara Idrysheva referred to as “the bravest step of our esteemed president.” In anticipation of this modification, Tokayev stepped down as chairman of the Amanat social gathering – a rebranded version of Nazarbayev’s ruling Nur Otan social gathering – on April 26. Additionally, the president can no longer override the acts of akims of oblasts, main cities, or the capital and shut family members of the president can not maintain political posts.

A number of proposed measures give parliament more energy vis-a-vis the president. Kazakhstan’s parliament will remain bicameral, but the distribution of power between the upper and lower homes will shift considerably. The Senate will no longer have the facility to make new laws, and as an alternative will simply approve or reject laws passed by the Mazhilis. Furthermore, the method for selecting deputies to each houses will change. 

First, the Mazhilis can be reduced to 98 deputies, following the abolition of 9 seats appointed by the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakhstan. These seats can be transferred to the Senate, and the Meeting of the Peoples will now solely get to nominate five deputies. The variety of deputies appointed by the president might be decreased from 15 to 10.

Second, Mazhilis deputies will be elected based on a mixed system. Seventy percent of Mazhilis deputies will be chosen by proportional elections, and 30 % might be straight elected.

The only proposed adjustments to the judicial system relate to the reestablishment of the Constitutional Court docket. Kazakhstan had a Constitutional Courtroom until the adoption of the 1995 constitution, which instituted a weaker constitutional council. The president still maintains a powerful influence over the Constitutional Court docket’s makeup, however, with the power to pick the courtroom’s chairman and 4 of the judges; parliament chooses the other three.

Tokayev has emphasised the importance of local governance, marked by the first-ever direct election of village akims and plans to introduce three new oblasts that will carry authorities our bodies closer to the populations they represent. Maybe essentially the most disappointing aspect of proposed reforms is the lack of great motion on local representation for residents of Kazakhstan’s largest cities. If the referendum passes, Kazakhstanis will get to vote for akims of oblasts, major cities, and the capital – nevertheless, the candidates may have been selected by the president. The right to elect native management has been one of the crucial constant calls for from Almaty residents, and this try to create choice is ultimately cosmetic.

The proposed reforms are important steps towards actual consultant government in Kazakhstan; nonetheless, they do not necessarily represent forward motion. Lots of the amendments are merely reinstating mechanisms of checks on presidential energy that beforehand existed, relatively than materially altering the connection between state and society, as Tokayev claims.