Supreme Court says leaked abortion draft is genuine; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest outdoors the U.S. Supreme Courtroom after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito making ready for a majority of the court docket to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights choice later this year, in Washington, U.S., Could 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Courtroom Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft courtroom opinion that might toss out longstanding abortion rights, but noted that isn't the court docket's ultimate choice.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Courtroom was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed," the chief justice mentioned in a statement. "The work of the Court docket won't be affected in any means."

"I've directed the Marshal of the Court docket to launch an investigation into the source of the leak," Roberts said.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is virtually unprecedented for the excessive courtroom, the place leaks of any type are exceedingly uncommon.

The court docket shares drafts of opinions internally long earlier than they are issued publicly, Roberts noted, calling it "a routine and essential a part of the Courtroom's confidential deliberative work."

The draft on this high-profile abortion case was created in February, in response to Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, law clerks and different staff of the court docket are "intensely loyal to the institution and devoted to the rule of regulation," Roberts said.

"Court staff have an exemplary and vital tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial course of and upholding the belief of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that belief that's an affront to the Court and the neighborhood of public servants who work right here," he stated.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who are now pushing for Congress to right away codify abortion rights via legislation.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and plenty of referred to as for the sort of investigation the Roberts announced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for placing decisions about abortion within the hands of states instead of the federal authorities.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, considered one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the best within the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Those pivotal rulings shield the fitting to get an abortion earlier than the point of fetal viability and require that rules limiting abortion entry do not pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We maintain that Roe and Casey have to be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the courtroom in Dobbs v. Jackson Girls's Well being Organization would facet with the state of Mississippi in protection of a regulation that might ban virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of being pregnant.

Decrease federal courts had blocked the regulation on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey decisions.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.