Former Idaho lawmaker found guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial in which the younger girl fled the witness stand during testimony, saying “I can’t do that.”
The intern instructed a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his condo after the two had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger said the intercourse was consensual.
On the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state consultant, but he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was discovered guilty Friday of rape. He was discovered not guilty of sexual penetration with a overseas object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the verdict was read, as he has throughout the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Decide Michael Reardon informed the jury: “This has been an uncommon case attended by many surprising circumstances, however I recognize your consideration ... and onerous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimal sentence of 1 year in prison in Idaho. The maximum penalty might be as excessive as life in prison, at the choose’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his lawyer who eliminated items from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but once they reached a lower ground they stopped to briefly to congratulate each other on the verdict.
Von Ehlinger’s lawyer, Jon Cox, could not be instantly reached for remark after the trial.
The Associated Press typically doesn't identify individuals who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the lady on this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press convention, Ada County Prosecuting Legal professional Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who handled the case.
“Last but not least, it took an incredible amount of courage for the victim in this case, Jane Doe, to return ahead,” Bennetts stated. “I need to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming ahead.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault started, earlier than abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to place his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe mentioned.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do that,” she mentioned, rapidly strolling out of the courtroom.
The judge gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to find her to determine if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she did not, the decide instructed the jurors they had to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it by no means happened,” because the protection couldn't cross-examine her.
Through the press convention, Deputy Prosecuting Lawyer Katelyn Farley stated the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however stated she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had ready for trial understanding that Doe might not be capable to testify.
“I believe it’s vital that she decided to stroll within the room, and he or she additionally decided to stroll out — those have been her decisions,” Welsh said.
During his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger typically spoke in a transparent, loud voice on to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his residence to “hang out” after consuming at a elaborate Boise restaurant. Then they began making out on the couch, he said.
“Things have been going well, and I asked (Doe) if she want to move to the bed room,” von Ehlinger mentioned. “She said ‘Certain.’ We obtained up, held fingers and walked into the bedroom.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till practically 8 p.m. Thursday earlier than the jury determined to break for the evening. At one point, the decide summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury requested a query. No details have been made public concerning the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations turned public — largely because of the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from some of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her title, photograph and private details about her life were repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of the people who regularly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, however legislation enforcement banned the man from the floor the place the case was being heard.
During closing arguments, Farley told jurors that the case was about “energy in the flawed arms” used to the “great devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and physical power over the petite intern, Farley mentioned.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley stated, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in several methods, she mentioned, highlighting the testimony of legislation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Phrases present lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t occur’ show lack of consent. Yanking your head back and getting an injury shows lack of consent,” Farley stated.
However von Ehlinger’s attorney told jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “red herrings,” and mentioned von Ehlinger was a reputable one who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who performed the sexual assault examination testified earlier this week. They stated Doe reported being pinned down while von Ehlinger compelled her to perform oral intercourse, and that she knew he steadily carried a handgun and had positioned it on a dresser close to the bed at the time of the assault. The nurse additionally testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from striking the wall or a headboard while attempting to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.